Prompt tracking
Agree on the questions that matter to your market, then track how selected AI platforms answer them over time.
We track the prompts, citations, and AI agents shaping how people discover your company—then turn the evidence into a clear plan.

Each area answers a different question. Together, they show what is happening and where useful work can begin.
Agree on the questions that matter to your market, then track how selected AI platforms answer them over time.
See whether your company, products, and key topics appear—and how the answer represents them.
Understand which AI crawlers request your pages and where access, structure, or content may be getting in the way.
Review the domains and pages used as sources, then identify realistic gaps in your own evidence and coverage.
Start with real buyer questions, comparisons, problems, and category language—not a large list designed to inflate a report.
Track selected responses, mentions, descriptions, and citations while keeping platform and sampling limits visible.
Combine answer evidence with website structure, useful content, search foundations, and agent activity where access is available.
Prioritize the content, technical, evidence, and distribution work that is most relevant to the gaps we can verify.
The exact scope is agreed around your market, website, access, and team. We keep verified evidence separate from estimates and recommendations.
A focused list of commercial, comparison, problem, and category questions relevant to your buyers.
A repeatable snapshot of where you appear, where you do not, and how the answer describes your company.
A review of the pages and domains referenced in sampled answers, with useful patterns—not a promise of citations.
Crawler and agent activity from available logs or integrations, plus a public-access review when private data is unavailable.
A short list of content, technical, internal-link, and evidence improvements ordered by likely usefulness.
Search demand, crawlability, helpful pages, and authority still support AEO. We improve both, with AEO as the primary lens.
AI answer systems still need accessible pages, clear information, useful evidence, and trusted sources. That means technical SEO, helpful content, internal links, and search demand remain important.
Our primary lens is AEO: how AI systems discover, describe, and reference your company. SEO supports that work instead of competing with it.
Answer engine optimization, or AEO, is the work of making a company and its information easier for AI answer systems to discover, understand, and reference. It overlaps with SEO but also examines prompts, AI answers, sources, and agent access.
SEO mainly improves how pages are discovered and understood in search engines. AEO also reviews how AI systems describe your company, which sources they use, and whether AI agents can reach useful content. Strong search foundations still matter to both.
The agreed scope can include widely used AI answer platforms such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and Copilot. Platform access, response behaviour, and available evidence change frequently, so the exact tracking plan is confirmed before work begins.
We can begin with public evidence. Agent traffic, private performance data, publishing, and deeper diagnosis may require access to server or edge logs, analytics, Search Console, your CMS, or other tools. We only use access that you deliberately provide for agreed work.
No. AI platforms choose their own answers and sources. We can measure selected evidence, improve access and content, and prioritize opportunities, but we do not guarantee mentions, citations, rankings, traffic, leads, or revenue.
Tell us about your company, website, and the AI search questions you care about. We’ll recommend a sensible starting scope.
Talk to Overhyped