Template QA
Compare representative pages after changing a shared article, product, or landing-page template.
See the document outline exposed by the initial HTML. The checker preserves source order and treats skipped levels or multiple H1 elements as context-dependent review items, not automatic ranking failures.
Compare representative pages after changing a shared article, product, or landing-page template.
Review the actual outline before rewriting headings for clarity and navigation.
Find empty elements or surprising jumps that deserve human inspection alongside the rendered page.
The tool processes what you enter, shows a plain-language result, and gives you a safer next step. Make the change on your website, deploy it, then test the live page again.
Compare representative pages after changing a shared article, product, or landing-page template.
Review the actual outline before rewriting headings for clarity and navigation.
Find empty elements or surprising jumps that deserve human inspection alongside the rendered page.
Multiple H1 elements can be valid HTML. Confirm whether the resulting page hierarchy remains clear to users and assistive technology.
Treat the jump as a review prompt rather than a severe SEO defect. Fix it when the document relationship is genuinely unclear.
Inspect whether the label is styled text, generated only by JavaScript, hidden, or absent from the semantic page structure.
One clear primary heading is a useful default, but the checker reports the evidence for review rather than enforcing an invented universal ranking rule.
A skipped level is a document-structure clue, not an automatic ranking penalty. Review whether it makes the content harder to navigate or understand.
No. It inspects pasted HTML or the initial public HTML response. Client-rendered headings may require a rendered-page accessibility check.
Understand the evidence behind this tool, where its result stops, and the safer next steps to verify on a live page.
Read the guideEvidence · Limitations · Verification